Accountability Atlas / Evidence project
Public record edition · November 7, 2026

Follow the filing.
Check the claim.

A three-era, source-linked atlas of criminal verdicts, civil findings, government watchdog conclusions, indictments, financial transactions and disputed allegations involving Donald Trump, his businesses and people in his administration. Receipts beat vibes.

🗂️ Three periods · 1973–2026⚖️ Personal vs company vs associate📋 Source trails in every case💻 Offline, no account required
What this does not claim: that all displayed actions are crimes, that three links equal three independent witnesses, or that a dismissed charge is a guilty verdict. Cases are grouped by when the conduct occurred; later verdicts and dismissals are dated separately.

The record, in context

Use the era cards to change the dashboard. Counts are case files, not counts of crimes.

Data snapshot: November 7, 2026
—
Curated case files in scope
—
Linked source references in scope
—
Case files with a court / regulatory outcome*
—
Distinct subject / defendant descriptions

Legal and procedural outcomes

Click any bar label to filter. Categories refer to different legal standards—not comparable guilt scores.
* Some findings concern an agency or associate, not Trump personally. Hover or open the underlying file for exact defendant and disposition.

Types of alleged conduct

Issue categories are descriptive. Click a category to see the supporting record.
Counts reflect editorial case selection, not a rate of wrongdoing within an era.

Two clocks: incident and decision

The conduct date may be decades before a verdict or order. Click a year to inspect files; legal-event bars count only cases with recorded later decision dates.
Only years represented in the selected era are shown. Scroll horizontally if needed.

Money with its units attached

Choose a comparable money category. Financial flows, fines, damages, and gross receipts are never added together.
Amounts may be findings, reported figures, claims, awards, or transactions. Inspect the case before treating an amount as personal profit.

What kinds of evidence appear?

Source-description tags on case files. A file may appear under several tags: these counts do not add to 100%.

Open the case files

Every file has a factual record, the legal or integrity question, limits, consequences and at least three references.

Loading case files…Bookmarks are stored in this browser when available

Compare two case files

Side-by-side procedural facts—not a scorecard for people. Compare a civil order with a conviction or a charged case that ended without trial.

Evidence rules and calibration

What makes a case relevant, and what it would take to establish something more.

01 · Identify the defendant

A corporate conviction is not an individual's conviction. A court's finding against an agency is not a criminal verdict against the president. Every case names the relevant parties and actual disposition.

02 · Separate the clocks

Conduct, complaint, indictment, jury verdict, appeal and clemency are different events. A 2024 conviction for 2016 conduct belongs with the underlying conduct, while displaying its later outcome.

03 · Demand the paper trail

At least three source links per case, with primary filings, court records or agency orders where accessible. Several reports using one document are not three independent confirmations.

04 · Compare standards consistently

Congressional trading disclosures alone do not establish insider trading. A personal benefit, inside information, a prohibited disclosure, materiality, intent and statutory scope are distinct questions. Apply identical tests to any politician.

05 · Respect final dispositions

A settlement may expressly disclaim admission. A dismissed indictment is not a conviction or automatically an exoneration. An overturned monetary remedy must not be presented as still enforceable.

06 · No made-up conviction odds

The app shows actual legal outcomes, evidentiary gaps and possible statutory bases, not percentage guesses about how hypothetical juries would vote. Potential sentences require elements, dates and defenses.

The Pelosi / Hunter Biden consistency test

The comparison has to start from reality rather than political slogans. Hunter Biden was convicted in a 2024 gun case and pleaded guilty to tax offenses, then received a presidential pardon; those are recorded legal events. Public congressional stock-trade reports involving Nancy Pelosi or her spouse are disclosures, not themselves verdicts of illegal insider trading. If one questions whether an official profited from nonpublic information, that same concrete proof standard must apply to Trump and associates.

DOJ · Hunter Biden gun verdict ↗DOJ · Tax guilty plea ↗DOJ · Clemency record ↗House Clerk · Pelosi transaction disclosure ↗
Scope / corrections: 2015–2016 and 2021–2024 include prosecution, reporting and procedural steps that fall between the three requested reporting windows. These are cross-referenced by conduct year rather than creating false term dates. The register is curated and not a complete census of every lawsuit, policy controversy, or allegation. Snapshot: November 7, 2026.